Order (Auto)April 7, 1999
A- de 1999
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa
✓Claimant Pabon Apicella Jorge Luis·Respondent --
✓
Topic · hard data
Sin Información
01
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
The case-law reporter has not yet indexed topics for this decision. The summary below describes what it is about.
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Sin información
Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02
What it decided
This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
See the operative part (5 points)
- PRIMERO. NO ACCEDER a las pretensiones del recurrente.
- SEGUNDO. CONFIRMAR el auto proferido el 12 de febrero de 1999 por medio del cual se inadmitió la demanda presentada por el ciudadano Jorge Luis Pabón Apicella en contra del artículo 74 del decreto 196 de 1971.
- TERCERO. Por Secretaría, notificar la presente decisión al recurrente, haciéndole saber que contra la misma no procede recurso alguno.
- CUARTO. Cumplido lo anterior, archívese el expediente previas las anotaciones de rigor;
- Notifiquese y Cumplase.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
04
How it connects
This decision has no citations or indexed topics in the Court's graph yet.